Plan D: cannula first, or scalpel only?: Reply
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Department of Health Action Plan “improving services for people with epilepsy”: a significant advance or only a first step?
The government in England has supported the production of a number of reports on services for people with epilepsy over the last three or four decades but these have not come with any promise to provide resources or to achieve change. In recent years, the voluntary agencies have worked with government in undertaking some very worthwhile initiatives. The publication of the audit on epilepsy-rela...
متن کامل“First Have a Plan then Make Sure It Is a Good Plan” or
This paper introduces an approach for dealing with underspecified spatial and temporal relations during early stage spatio-temporal planning in large-scale unfamiliar environments. For that purpose a partial spatio-temporal constraint satisfaction algorithm is introduced. The algorithm operates on a qualitative as well as metric representation of the given spatio-temporal relations. In order to...
متن کاملThe great airway debate: is the scalpel mightier than the cannula?
Although anaesthetists are experts at managing a patient with airway obstruction, most have never had to perform emergency front-of-neck access (FONA) procedures. The need to resort to an emergency FONA procedure is extremely rare and may occur only once in an anaesthetist’s professional lifetime. Despite the low incidence of a cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate (CICO) crisis, the outcome accoun...
متن کاملHIF stabilizing agents: shotgun or scalpel?
THE FETUS DEVELOPS IN HYPOXIA (3–5% O2), which is essential for the vasculature. Vascular growth, in turn, is required for lung development (11). For these processes, the essential role of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is increasingly apparent. Genetic inactivation of either HIF-1 or -2 in mice leads to fetal or neonatal lethality because of major developmental defects...
متن کاملChoice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program: Reply.
We explore the in- and out-of-sample robustness of tests for choice inconsistencies based on parameter restrictions in parametric models, focusing on tests proposed by Ketcham, Kuminoff, and Powers (2016). We argue that their nonparametric alternatives are inherently conservative with respect to detecting mistakes. We then show that our parametric model is robust to KKP's suggested specificatio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Anaesthesia
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0007-0912
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew287